While no universally-accepted definition of financial literacy exists, one
that is broad and often cited comes from the United States President's
Advisory Council on Financial Literacy (2008, p. 4): "the ability to use
knowledge and skills to manage financial resources effectively for a
lifetime of financial wellbeing." Economists (and other researchers),
however, are particularly concerned about two issues regarding financial
lit- eracy: (i) how best to improve financial literacy; and (ii) how much
of an impact (if any) higher financial literacy rates will have on actual
financial behaviour.
One of the most comprehensive studies of Americans' financial knowledge,
skills and behaviour comes from the FINRA Investor Education Foundation
(2009). They sur- veyed over 28,000 people across the United States in
October 2009. The survey included a basic financial literacy test that
resulted in a failing average grade (less than 60 per cent). Also, they
found that only 35 per cent of households had enough savings to cover three
months of expenses (rainy-day funds). 73 per cent of households had at
least one credit card, but only 41 per cent of them reported that in the
last 12 months they always paid their debts in full. Despite these
findings, over two-thirds of people surveyed ranked themselves as highly
knowledgeable about personal finance overall.
Financial illiteracy is a worldwide problem. Recent cross-national studies
(see Atkinson and Messy, 2012; Xu and Zia, 2012) show that people in many
countries (including the United States) have difficulty answering basic
personal finance questions. These studies also found significant
similarities between countries as to the most financially illiterate
groups. For example, women had comparatively lower financial literacy
scores in almost all countries. Further, financial literacy follows an
inverted-U shape where younger people and older people have the lowest
levels of financial literacy (Xu and Zia, 2012).
The need for improved financial literacy has grown over the past 30 years
as the com- plexity and availability of consumer financial products has
expanded (student loans, credit cards, complex mortgages). Also, people are
increasingly responsible for their financial planning. For example, in the
United States (and other countries) a shift from defined benefit plans (for
instance, pensions) to defined contribution plans (for instance, 401(k)
plans) has placed a greater burden of retirement planning onto individuals
- many of whom, as shown in the FINRA survey quoted above, have trouble
managing their basic personal finances. Thus, many 401(k) plans have lower
returns and lack long-run risk pooling (Ollerman and Boivie, 2011; Olen,
2012).
Among younger people, the Jump$tart Coalition for Personal Financial
Literacy devel- oped a comprehensive personal finance test that they
administered to high-school seniors biennially from 1997 to 2008 (a
total sample of over 16,000 students). Students taking the test in 1997
scored an average of 57.3 per cent (the highest score of all six years)
com- pared to 48.3 per cent in 2008 (the lowest score in all six
years). The number of students passing the exam (scoring at least 60
per cent) fell from 47.2 per cent in 1997 to 31 per cent in 2008.
Perhaps the most disturbing result from Jump$tart's surveys is that
after controlling for factors such as teacher quality and student
interest/ability, students who took at least a one-semester course in
personal finance performed worse than all other students (Mandell,
2008).
Therefore, it is unlikely that financial literacy alone will keep many
people from making adverse financial decisions. Some researchers (see
Garon, 2012; Olen, 2012) argue that the reasons people have difficulty
managing their finances has less to do with inadequate knowledge and
skills and more to do with the domestic economy. Stagnant median wages,
rising income inequality, rising costs of health care and education,
among other factors, are squeezing the balance sheets of households. As
a result, many people accu- mulate debt - less out of ignorance than a
necessity to maintain a standard of living. Financially savvy people
are not immune to unemployment, health problems, and rising college
costs. Also, significant financial literacy (and legal knowledge) is
needed to under- stand complex credit card contracts, fraudulent
mortgage loans and other predatory lending practices.
In addition to these macroeconomic effects, many behavioural economists
(and psy- chologists) argue that personal finance decisions are as much
(or more) influenced by emotion as logic. Much of this emotion is
culturally driven. As Veblen (1899 [1994],
p. 109) wrote, "[p]ropensity for emulation [. . .] is a pervading trait
of human nature". Financial education, therefore, should not only teach
basic finance concepts, but also explore the behavioural aspects of
spending, saving and investing. An innovative attempt at influencing
behaviour while teaching finance skills is through videogames (Tufano
et al., 2010). If the argument is valid that violent videogames can
beget violence, then it is possible that games promoting financial
responsibility can result in greater financial responsibility in the
real world. Game on.
See also:
Financial crisis; Financial innovation; Housing bubble.
No comments:
Post a Comment